ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To have anatomic measurements of carotid artery bifurcation (CAB) with 64-spiral computed tomography angiography (64-SCTA), and provide anatomic basis for related research. Methods: Imaging data of 92 subjects (45 males, 47 females, the age range 20-82 years and mean age 48.4 ± 6.1 years) without pathology of CAB, who underwent 64-SCTA in head and neck from June 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010, were selected from the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Fujian, China. On the 3D images, the angle and size of CAB were measured, and the statistical comparisons of measurements were made between the bilateral, sex and age groups. Results: The measurements of CAB were divided into young (≤ 40 years) and older (> 40 years) groups: bifurcation angle is 36.206° ± 10.210° and 49.343° ± 16.489°, respectively; the inner diameter of common carotid artery (CCA) is 6.820 ± 0.635 and 6.845 ± 0.838 mm, respectively; the proximal inner diameter of internal carotid artery (ICA) is 7.143 ± 0.992 and 7.476 ± 1.630 mm, of the enlargement is 7.568 ± 1.069 and 8.554 ± 1.733 mm, of the distal is 4.897 ± 0.508 and 5.123 ± 0.699 mm, respectively; the inner diameter of external carotid artery (ECA) is 4.324 ± 0.580 and 4.104 ± 0.638 mm, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in all the measurements between male and female groups, in the bifurcation angle, inner diameters of ICA and ECA between young and older groups, and in the bifurcation angle between the left and right (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A 64-SCTA with 3D image post-processing technique can clearly observe and show the CAB. All CAB measurements will provide the objective basis for applied anatomy, imaging diagnosis and surgery treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin based chemotherapy regimen was one of the most used chemotherapy modality for metastatic colorectal cancer. The purpose of this meta‑analysis was to assess the clinical activity and toxicities of cetuximab plus oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy regimen for metastatic colorectal Cancer. METHODS: We searched the clinical studies about the cetuximab plus oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy regimen versus oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy alone for metastatic colorectal cancer in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochran, and CNKI. The data of response and toxicities were extracted and pooled by random or fixed effects model. And publication bias was evaluated by begg’s funnel plot and egger’s regression test. RESULTS: Seven papers were included in this study. Adding cetuximab to oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy regime can significant increase response rate in K‑RAS mutation metastatic colorectal patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–1.80, Z = 3.38, P = 0.001) and metastatic colorectal patients without knowing the K‑RAS status (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11–1.65, Z = 1.89, P = 0.003). But for patients with mutated K‑RAS, the improvement for objective response rate was not statistical significant (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49–1.01, Z = 3.00, P = 0.058) when adding cetuximab to oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy regime. The pooled results indicating the rash and diarrhea risk was significantly increased in the combined treatment group (P < 0.05). The toxicity of peripheral neuritis was decreased by adding the cetuximab (P < 0.05). And other toxicities were not statistical different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significant publication bias was found in toxicities evaluation. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab plus oxaliplatin‑based chemotherapy regimen significant increase the response rate for metastatic colorectal cancer. But the some toxicities such rash and diarrhea risk was also increased.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Angiogenesis plays an important role in the biology of ovarian cancer. The clinical efficacy and side effects of bevacizumab, the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, on survival and toxicity in women with this ovarian cancer, was not conclusive. We performed this systematic review and meta‑analysis in order to clarify the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the electronic database of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and CNKI for clinical controlled trials of comparing bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The primary outcomes of eligible studies included median progression‑free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities such as enterobrosis, hypertension, albuminuria, congestive heart failure (CHF), neutrophils, thrombosis, and bleeding. The Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk were used for the meta‑analysis and were expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All the statistical analyses were carried out by Stata 11.0 software (http://www.stata.com; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS: We included 5 studies with 1798 cases in the bevacizumab combined with the chemotherapy group and 1810 subjects in the chemotherapy alone group. The pooled results showed that bevacizumab + chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone can significant prolong the median PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.82; P < 0.05) but not the OS (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59–10.9; P > 0.05); the toxicity analysis showed that the enterobrosis, hypertension, albuminuria, neutrophils, thrombosis, and bleeding were significantly increased in the bevacizumab + chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy alone (Pall < 0.05). But the CHF risk between the two groups was not statistical different (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy prolonged the median PFS in patients with ovarian cancer but also increase the risk of developing enterobrosis, hypertension, albuminuria, neutrophils, thrombosis, and bleeding.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anatomy and medical imaging characteristics in a study observing the atlanto-axial joint (AAJ) and related structures. METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens of the AAJ segment were studied with both anatomical and imaging methods. The vertebral arteries of the AAJ segment (VA-A), the first and second cervical nerves (CN1, CN2) and synovial fold (SF) of the AAJ were observed and measured. RESULT: After extending from the vertebral canal, the CN1 goes between the posterior arch of the atlas and VA-A, and the CN2 passes between the posterior arch of the atlas and axis, and is posterior to VA-A. Among the eight cases, six were found in the SF in the central anterior AAJ and five in lateral. The vertebral arteries of the AAJ segment go along the AAJ with four curves, of which the second and fourth are away from the bone structure of the AAJ. The distance from CN1, CN2 to VA-A and that from the second, fourth curve of VA-A to AAJ is 0.0-2.2 mm, 0.0-3.6 mm and 0.0-4.8 mm, 2.0-7.9 mm respectively. There is no significant difference between the measurements made anatomically and those by the imaging method (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The anatomical method has advantages in observing the CN and SF, while the imaging method shows clearly and directly the VA-A and AAJ. Both are mutually complementary with consistent measurements. The combined use of the two provides a new way to study the complicated anatomy in this region.
OBJETIVO: Evaluar las características del método anatómico y el uso de la imagen médica en un estudio de observación de la articulación atlanto-axial (AAA) y estructuras relacionadas. MÉTODOS: Se estudiaron ocho especimenes cadavéricos del segmento de la AAA tanto con métodos anatómicos como con métodos de imaginología médica. Las arterias vertebrales del segmento de AAA (AV-A), el primer y el segundo nervios cervicales (NC1, NC2) y los pliegues sinoviales (PS) fueron observados y medidos. RESULTADO: Tras de extenderse desde el canal vertebral, el NC1 se extiende entre el arco posterior del atlas, y el NC2 pasa entre el arco posterior del atlas y el axis, y es posterior a las AV-A. Entre los ocho casos, se encontraron seis en los PS en la AAA anterior central, y cinco en la lateral. Las arterias vertebrales del segmento AAA van junto con la AAA con cuatro curvas, de las cuales la segunda y la cuarta están separadas de la estructura ósea de la AAA. La distancia del NC1 y NC2, a las AV-A, y la de la segunda y cuarta curvas de las AV-A a la AAA es 0.0-2.2 mm, 0.0-3.6 mm y 0.0-4.8 mm, 2.0-7.9 mm respectivamente. No hay ninguna diferencia significativa entre las mediciones realizadas anatómicamente y las hechas mediante métodos de imaginología (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIÓN: El método anatómico tiene ventajas al observar el NC y los PS, mientras que el método imaginológico muestra clara y directamente las AV-A y la AAA. Ambos son mutualmente complementarios con las mediciones. El uso combinado de los dos proporciona una nueva manera de estudiar la complicada anatomía de esta región.